I’m not a big fan of “doing church”…at least not the way we’ve done it for the past 30+ years. I’ve been in the Church of Christ my whole life. Although frustrated with my fellowship/denomination (as reflected in many of my posts) over the years, I love the church and will continue to teach what I believe to be God’s truth concerning the church. That being said, I think we’ve missed so much regarding the assembly.
We seem to have the impression that God has sanctioned what we do on Sunday mornings as sacred and the scriptural way of “doing church.” Who are we kidding? Does anyone really believe that the way we conduct our assemblies is anything remotely like the way the 1st century church did it? Does anyone really believe that God expects us to pattern our assemblies exactly like those in the 1st century? Can anyone even find a church assembly in the New Testament that looks anything like what we do on Sunday mornings?
In our noble quest to be accurate with the Bible and in our attempts to get our doctrine correct, we have missed the boat on the nature of the church assembly. Many today expect the Sunday assembly to look like it did in the 1st century. What they actually mean, however, is that it look like it did 40-50 years ago. Those same people don’t realize that the assemblies of 40-50 years ago don’t look like the assemblies from 40-50 years prior to that! What many want today is for the assembly to look like it did when they were growing up. It boils down to what they’re comfortable with. It’s not a matter of scripture at all! There is no scripture authorizing what a Sunday assembly of Christians should look like!!
As to doctrine, I’m proud of our attempts to “get it right.” But how much do we have to get right? What if we get it all right except one little doctrinal matter? Will God say, “Oh, sorry! You almost made it?” We CAN’T do it all right! Isn’t that why grace abounds in Christ? So why do we think we have to have it all right regarding the assembly? Do we really think that Christ died for our one hour on Sunday mornings? The way we fuss, fight, and divide over that one hour–one would think so. Most of the issues my fellowship has divided over revolve around what goes on in the Sunday morning assembly.
It’s sad, frustrating, and discouraging. We must teach our young differently than we have in the past, or we’ll continue to divide and splinter until we’ve fragmented ourselves out of existence! Jesus didn’t go to the cross for our one hour on Sunday mornings! He went to the cross to redeem us from all our screw-ups–Sunday through Saturday.

NOTE: This post is another opinion in my list of reasons as to why the church is losing more young people and adult members. If time permits, you really should read the previous two postings.
In my last post I listed a couple of my theories behind the exodus of young people from churches throughout our land. This post will add another theory to that list. I don’t think this exodus is relegated exclusively to young people. I think a lot of adults have become disillusioned and disenfranchised with their particular denomination or church in general. Although extremely frustrated at times, I have yet to become disenfranchised with the Church of Christ to the point of abandoning it altogether. A wise friend once told me, “You’re either part of the solution, or part of the problem.” I chose to be part of the solution. Yes, I could be a part of whatever denomination I choose, but fleeing my particular denomination will not solve anything. I believe abandonment to be a cop-out. It’s not biblical or God-honoring. It’s taking the easy way out. Commitment to the church boils down to a fundamental understanding of the church.
Religious groups continue to seek the answer to the question, “Why are we losing so many of our young people after high school?” In our own movement (Churches of Christ), there was a lecture held on the campus of Freed-Hardeman University addressing this question. I did not attend, so I don’t know what was offered as the reason or reasons behind so many exiting our churches. I do, however, have my own opinion (and I apply this opinion generally).

I used to think it was a positive character trait. Compartmentalizing your life was something that kept a lot of emotions in check, as well as justifying certain behaviors. Bill Clinton was lauded as one who made no bones about fitting various aspects of his life into certain compartments. There was his public life, his political life, his presidential life, his past life, and his private life (unfortunately, he couldn’t keep Monica Lewinsky in the private compartment, or certain other women in his past compartment).
I used to be an alarmist. I’m trying not to be anymore. That’s why I have to rant for just a moment about the alarmist hysteria surrounding the upcoming movie,
I wonder how many of our churches today really care about the marginalized?
I’m proud of my congregation in Jackson, the
Recent Comments